Friday, April 12, 2013


These Senators by voting for Cloture on the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S.649 ) proved two things.  ALL of these Senators, everyone of them proved:

1 They Want To TAKE Your Guns And Gun Rights Away.

2. They Don't Believe In The Bill Of Rights.





There is No Need for more Gun Control.  What they are attempting to do will do NOTHING to prevent what they are CLAIMING to want to do.  If they don't understand that then they aren't smart enough to be in charge of such decisions anyway.  If they do understand then it just proves it is Their Attempt to AGAIN and MORE limit our rights.

If you live in a state where your Senator voted Yea on this you should contact them and state your displeasure with their vote.  You should also promise yourself and Them that you WON'T forget and you WILL work to defeat them if they don't change their position.

If  WE, (the people who love America and her promise of Freedom) don't come together and fight these so called elected officials and insist they do OUR bidding or we will work to remove them from their job of representing us,  (because they aren't by voting this way} there will be a time, listen there will be a time we won't be able to do anything.

We don't have to have a lot of things in common except our LOVE for OUR Country and OUR Freedom and OUR GOD!

Here is how the vote went.

On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S.649 )
Vote Number: 95 Vote Date: April 11, 2013, 11:03 AM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to
Measure Number: S. 649 (Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of2013 )
Measure Title: A bill to ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the national instant criminal background check system and require a background check for every firearm sale, and for other purposes.
Vote Counts: YEAs 68

NAYs 31

Not Voting 1

YEAs ---68
Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Collins (R-ME)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Cowan (D-MA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Flake (R-AZ)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Heller (R-NV)
Hirono (D-HI)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Kirk (R-IL)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Toomey (R-PA)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)


NAYs ---31
Barrasso (R-WY)
Begich (D-AK)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Coats (R-IN)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Lee (R-UT)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Pryor (D-AR)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Not Voting - 1
Lautenberg (D-NJ)


 You can follow me on Twitter at

 Facebook at

Monday, March 18, 2013

SENATORS Still Playing Games

The Games Senators Are STILL Playing.

What are some of the GAMES our elected officials play?  Isn't the Game Of Cloture that U.S. Senators play, a game of deceit?  Deceit that would mean deception or deceive.  Do Senators think that the people that elects them are that dumb and do not understand what they are doing?

The Senators play games again with the issue of John O. Brennan.  Every Senator who votes FOR Cloture which means YEA and then votes AGAINST confirmation, which means NAY is, let me say again IS PLAYING GAMES!  If you are going to vote against him then you should vote against Cloture.  Voting FOR Cloture gives up ANY power you have of stopping this appointment.

On the John Brennan votes for CIA Director again Senators play their game.  People say he shouldn't be CIA Director YET they vote away their power to stop it.  (CLOTURE)

16 NAY votes on Cloture YET 34 NAY votes on Confirmation. 18 Senators PLAYING GAMES!!!

Monday, March 4, 2013


What are some of the GAMES our elected officials play? Isn't the Game Of Cloture that U.S. Senators play, a game of deceit? 

  Deceit that would mean deception or deceive. Do Senators think that the people that elects them are that dumb and do not understand what they are doing?

  On the Chuck Hagel vote for Secy. of Defense the Republicans had a way of stopping it. MANY said Hagel wasn't qualified to be Secy. Of Defense. Yet these same people decided to give up the power to stop it. Oh they voted against him when his nomination came up for a full vote of the senate. Here is where the deceit or deception comes into play. With the make up of the senate voting for cloture was the same as voting for Chuck Hagel. The only way they could have stopped this was to vote against cloture. So remember this American Citizens when your Senator says or campaigns he voted against Chuck Hagel's nomination but they voted FOR or YEA on CLOTURE they opened the door for Hagel's approval. If they really felt he shouldn't be put in as Secy. Of Defense then they should have voted NO or NAY on CLOTURE. PERIOD!!! 

So are they attempting to mislead you? Are they actually lying to you by trying to mislead you?? It is such stunts like this that people with Common Sense can't understand how someone can do this and have integrity. Is it because they don't have integrity? It is the very stunts and language like this is the reason the country , OUR COUNTRY, is in such a big mess. For OUR Children and THEIR FUTURE we have to DEMAND INTEGRITY from our elected officials. HOW THEY VOTED ON CLOTURE Remember ALL that voted Yea BUT voted NO on the nomination are trying to mislead someone! Is it YOU!!

Alexander (R-TN), Yea Ayotte (R-NH), Yea Baldwin (D-WI), Yea Barrasso (R-WY), Nay Baucus (D-MT), Yea Begich (D-AK), Yea Bennet (D-CO), Yea Blumenthal (D-CT), Yea Blunt (R-MO), Yea Boozman (R-AR), Nay Boxer (D-CA), Yea Brown (D-OH), Yea Burr (R-NC), Yea Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Cardin (D-MD), Yea Carper (D-DE), Yea Casey (D-PA), Yea Chambliss (R-GA), Yea Coats (R-IN), Nay Coburn (R-OK), Yea Cochran (R-MS), Yea Collins (R-ME), Yea Coons (D-DE), Yea Corker (R-TN), Yea Cornyn (R-TX), Nay Cowan (D-MA), Yea Crapo (R-ID), Nay Cruz (R-TX), Nay Donnelly (D-IN), Yea Durbin (D-IL), Yea Enzi (R-WY), Nay Feinstein (D-CA), Yea Fischer (R-NE), Nay Flake (R-AZ), Yea Franken (D-MN), Yea Gillibrand (D-NY), Yea Graham (R-SC), Yea Grassley (R-IA), Nay Hagan (D-NC), Yea Harkin (D-IA), Yea Hatch (R-UT), Yea Heinrich (D-NM), Yea Heitkamp (D-ND), Yea Heller (R-NV), Nay Hirono (D-HI), Yea Hoeven (R-ND), Nay Inhofe (R-OK), Nay Isakson (R-GA), Nay Johanns (R-NE), Yea Johnson (D-SD), Yea Johnson (R-WI), Nay Kaine (D-VA), Yea King (I-ME), Yea Kirk (R-IL), Nay Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea Landrieu (D-LA), Yea Lautenberg (D-NJ), Not Voting Leahy (D-VT), Yea Lee (R-UT), Nay Levin (D-MI), Yea Manchin (D-WV), Yea McCain (R-AZ), Yea McCaskill (D-MO), Yea McConnell (R-KY), Nay Menendez (D-NJ), Yea Merkley (D-OR), Yea Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Moran (R-KS), Nay Murkowski (R-AK), Yea Murphy (D-CT), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea Nelson (D-FL), Yea Paul (R-KY), Nay Portman (R-OH), Nay Pryor (D-AR), Yea Reed (D-RI), Yea Reid (D-NV), Yea Risch (R-ID), Nay Roberts (R-KS), Nay Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea Rubio (R-FL), Nay Sanders (I-VT), Yea Schatz (D-HI), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea Scott (R-SC), Nay Sessions (R-AL), Yea Shaheen (D-NH), Yea Shelby (R-AL), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea Tester (D-MT), Yea Thune (R-SD), Yea Toomey (R-PA), Nay Udall (D-CO), Not Voting Udall (D-NM), Yea Vitter (R-LA), Nay Warner (D-VA), Yea Warren (D-MA), Yea Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea Wicker (R-MS), Nay Wyden (D-OR), Yea

WHO VOTED NO ON THE NOMINATION OF CHUCK HAGEL I would question ANYONE'S integrity who voted NO on this list BUT voted YEA on cloture!!! What about you? Does it seem ODD to you?

Alexander (R-TN) Ayotte (R-NH) Barrasso (R-WY) Blunt (R-MO) Boozman (R-AR) Burr (R-NC) Chambliss (R-GA) Coats (R-IN) Coburn (R-OK) Collins (R-ME) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Crapo (R-ID) Cruz (R-TX) Enzi (R-WY) Fischer (R-NE) Flake (R-AZ) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Hatch (R-UT) Heller (R-NV) Hoeven (R-ND) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Johnson (R-WI) Kirk (R-IL) Lee (R-UT) McCain (R-AZ) McConnell (R-KY) Moran (R-KS) Murkowski (R-AK) Portman (R-OH) Risch (R-ID) Roberts (R-KS) Rubio (R-FL) Scott (R-SC) Sessions (R-AL) Thune (R-SD) Toomey (R-PA) Vitter (R-LA) Wicker (R-MS)

Total People Voting On The Hagel Nomination. Is Your Senator Trying To Mislead YOU? 

 Alabama: Sessions (R-AL), Nay Shelby (R-AL), Yea Alaska: Begich (D-AK), Yea Murkowski (R-AK), Nay Arizona: Flake (R-AZ), Nay McCain (R-AZ), Nay Arkansas: Boozman (R-AR), Nay Pryor (D-AR), Yea California: Boxer (D-CA), Yea Feinstein (D-CA), Yea Colorado: Bennet (D-CO), Yea Udall (D-CO), Yea Connecticut: Blumenthal (D-CT), Yea Murphy (D-CT), Yea Delaware: Carper (D-DE), Yea Coons (D-DE), Yea Florida: Nelson (D-FL), Yea Rubio (R-FL), Nay Georgia: Chambliss (R-GA), Nay Isakson (R-GA), Nay Hawaii: Hirono (D-HI), Yea Schatz (D-HI), Yea Idaho: Crapo (R-ID), Nay Risch (R-ID), Nay Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Yea Kirk (R-IL), Nay Indiana: Coats (R-IN), Nay Donnelly (D-IN), Yea Iowa: Grassley (R-IA), Nay Harkin (D-IA), Yea Kansas: Moran (R-KS), Nay Roberts (R-KS), Nay Kentucky: McConnell (R-KY), Nay Paul (R-KY), Yea Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea Vitter (R-LA), Nay Maine: Collins (R-ME), Nay King (I-ME), Yea Maryland: Cardin (D-MD), Yea Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Massachusetts: Cowan (D-MA), Yea Warren (D-MA), Yea Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea Minnesota: Franken (D-MN), Yea Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea Mississippi: Cochran (R-MS), Yea Wicker (R-MS), Nay Missouri: Blunt (R-MO), Nay McCaskill (D-MO), Yea Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea Tester (D-MT), Yea Nebraska: Fischer (R-NE), Nay Johanns (R-NE), Yea Nevada: Heller (R-NV), Nay Reid (D-NV), Yea New Hampshire: Ayotte (R-NH), Nay Shaheen (D-NH), Yea New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Not Voting Menendez (D-NJ), Yea New Mexico: Heinrich (D-NM), Yea Udall (D-NM), Yea New York: Gillibrand (D-NY), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea North Carolina: Burr (R-NC), Nay Hagan (D-NC), Yea North Dakota: Heitkamp (D-ND), Yea Hoeven (R-ND), Nay Ohio: Brown (D-OH), Yea Portman (R-OH), Nay Oklahoma: Coburn (R-OK), Nay Inhofe (R-OK), Nay Oregon: Merkley (D-OR), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Yea Pennsylvania: Casey (D-PA), Yea Toomey (R-PA), Nay Rhode Island: Reed (D-RI), Yea Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea South Carolina: Graham (R-SC), Nay Scott (R-SC), Nay South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Yea Thune (R-SD), Nay Tennessee: Alexander (R-TN), Nay Corker (R-TN), Nay Texas: Cornyn (R-TX), Nay Cruz (R-TX), Nay Utah: Hatch (R-UT), Nay Lee (R-UT), Nay Vermont: Leahy (D-VT), Yea Sanders (I-VT), Yea Virginia: Kaine (D-VA), Yea Warner (D-VA), Yea Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea West Virginia: Manchin (D-WV), Yea Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea Wisconsin: Baldwin (D-WI), Yea Johnson (R-WI), Nay Wyoming: Barrasso (R-WY), Nay Enzi (R-WY), Nay

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Four years ago I posted a message to then President-Elect Obama. You can read it at this link: A Chance To Be A Great President! Mr. Obama you had a chance to be a GREAT President. You had a chance to be President of and for ALL the people. I didn't agree with you, I didn't vote for you and I didn't believe you or in you. I have watched you perform for four years. It hasn't been a good performance if you love this country and the principals it was founded on. Instead of taking that chance you were given to actually become a great president for our country you decided to be as partisan as a person could be and instead of bringing people together you have made the split larger. You decided you weren't going to work with anyone that didn't agree with you. And for two years you didn't have too and you didn't. You say things that surely you know aren't the truth, yet you still say them. It appears to me that the most important thing to you is to be re-elected. Even though that would be important a GREAT man and president would sometimes put politics aside with dealing with things that are important to America and her people. Too me the last straw was a comment you made the other day that I couldn't believe you would have made after the killing of 4 Americans in service of their country. Especially after what has come out about this and what will come out about this before it is over with. LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND Is this what AMERICA is now? Does AMERICA stand and watch their Solders fighting to stay alive and NOT send help in?? A Hero's Father Talks! Whose America is these Kinds of Actions??? More and more is breaking about this story. The Main Stream Media isn't doing their job as they should. Read, Share and get it out so they can't ignore this story. Listen to the father of the Seal who lost his life TRYING to save other Americans. WHOSE AMERICA IS THIS KIND OF ACTION BY THE PEOPLE IN POWER? IT IS TIME THEY ARE MADE TO ACCOUNT FOR THEIR ACTIONS. IN HONOR OF THE FALLEN PLEASE READ AND LISTEN TO THIS STORY. If it turns your stomach PLEASE Share It. I know a lot of people say you are a good person. Now why do they say that? They don't agree with you but are they trying to give you an out? I don't think you are a good person. I base this on your actions the last four years. Watching you speak and perform and react. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think so. A good person wouldn't let 4 Americans in service of their country die without trying to help them if possible. In the Benghazi Embassy attack it would have been possible to send in help. Why didn't you do that? People's lives were saved because heroes wouldn't stand down. Why isn't the main stream media talking about this? The media should be reporting instead of trying to cover up stories that might hurt who they support. If the main stream media doesn't stop acting like anything but a real media outlet then in time they will find themselves being thought of as the fringe media. Tomorrow Americans will decide what kind of America they want by the way they cast their ballots. This reminds me of 1980. I remember it well. America had lost her pride. Countries didn't respect or fear her. Our spirit and pride had been hurt by a man named Jimmy Carter. Ronald Reagan gave our country its pride back. We need someone to give us our pride back. Mr. Obama you aren't that person. You have been so busy the last four years telling the world what is wrong with America that many have forgotten what is right with this great country. I can only hope for our kids and grand kids sakes that the results of 2012 will be like the results of 1980 when a man who was a very bad president was sent home. I think the people of this country that loves this country and believes in the founding principals of this great country will speak on November 6, 2012. They will say NO to the last four years. Mr. Obama it is too bad you didn't take the chance you had to be a great president but the truth of it was you wasn't up to the job and you failed because of you and how you tried to govern. No other reason or any other persons fault. Instead of spending all your time trying to lay the blame for anything bad at other peoples feet, maybe you should have been using that energy trying to come up with ideas that would really work instead of coming up with ideas that would only damage this country. Enjoy your retirement while we try to dig our country out of the hole you have put her in. I never thought I would see a president worse then Jimmy Carter but in you Barack Obama I have seen a person who has actually done more damage then Mr. Carter.

Monday, May 3, 2010



Someone is calling to take up guns! I can hear it now. From the Progressive Socialist Democrats that have no problem saying what ever it takes to gain or stay in power, how will they spin (lie) about it?

The Democratic Party has been taken over in leadership by Progressive Socialist. People with beliefs and thought processes that most real Democrats wouldn't agree with. The Republican Party isn't much better. Mostly they are moving slower but there are still a lot of Progressive members of the Republican Party.

Both parties are afraid of the Tea Party Movement. The Democrats want to call members of the Tea Party Movement names and attempt to marginalize them. A lot of Republicans want to try and bring them in, but if they did that would the movement cease?

Many on the Republican side will say that a third party such as the Tea Party Movement would only take away from Republicans and put Democrats in office. Can either party be trusted? I think not and Washington D.C. needs a shock and make over.

It is important to take EGO out of the picture. Look at some of these elected officials that have been in office so long that they think the seat is THEIR seat. They think they know best and that we are too dumb to understand what needs to be done. Even though these same people vote for a bill they haven't even read.

I say to all Tea Parties get the EGO out and come together and wrap our arms together in a line that can't be broken. We need a true National third party that isn't beholden to the old way of life in DC. We need common men and women making the laws. People who won't write 10 pages to say something that can be said in 1 page. People who just want to go and try and get the country back to the way the founders intended then go home and live.

It is time we think out of the box and act outside of the box. It is time for all Patriots to come together and form a party that is for the people and the constitution of the United States. Where do we start? Getting our EGO's out of the way. We can't have this a a better Tea Party Group or that is a better Tea Party Group. We all have good intentions and desires for our country. We agree about so many things so if we can put the Ego in it's pen then we can and should work together.

Who will take the lead to start a National Tea Party? But with that we also need local Tea Parties. It is time and it is needed.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Juan McCain On The Border Issue

Here is a post I put on the blog during the election of 08. Since McCain is running to try and save his senate seat I thought maybe I should post it again. Even though he may be talking different now, don't believe it. He hasn't changed how he truly feels and his conservative talk of now is because of his fear of losing his bid for another 6 years in the senate.

Trust me, if he gets another 6 years you will start seeing him again not only reaching across the isle but pulling up a chair and sitting down. As Patrick Henry said:

"I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past." Patrick Henry


One of the issues that American's understand and care about is closing our borders. Again I ask how can you really say we are fighting a war on terror and we REFUSE to close our borders. Another way to slow the McCain Train is shine the light on one of his advisors. Juan Hernandez. If you watch any of the talk cable news shows you have seen this guy.

Open borders advocate Juan Hernandez has joined the McCain campaign

GLENN: Here it is, here's John McCain.

VOICE: I wonder if you agree with those policies. If so, explain it to me. And if not, why is he on your staff.

McCAIN: He's on my staff because he supports my policies and my proposals and my legislative proposal to secure the borders first, that no one will receive Social Security benefits who is in this country illegally. I don't know what his previous positions are, other previous positions are but he supports mine. I have nothing to do with his. And he has volunteered to help me with outreach to our Hispanic citizenry as that is his reach as I outreach to every citizen in America. I've made very clear my position on immigration, made very clear on my position on Social Security and, of course, I am grateful that we have so many people who came from Ireland to the United States of America and anybody else who can come here legally under the right system and that's the only system that I would ever support and I have no idea but I will check into the information you've given me. But I want to promise you I will secure our borders. I will not allow anyone to come here illegally. I will not allow anyone to receive Social Security or any other benefit because they have come here illegally and broken our laws.

GLENN: Okay. That's John McCain. Now, it's so disingenuous to say he doesn't know who this man is or his policies. This is a guy who used to work for Vicente Fox. He is the most open border guy you could possibly imagine. Here's just one clip of Juan Hernandez, and we've got tons of them and we'll be playing them over the next few days. Here's just one clip of Juan Hernandez on TV.

HERNANDEZ: I don't think that we need to build walls to control immigration. We are the 21st century now and we're a country that has always broken down walls. Once again with regard to securing the borders, we need to work with Mexico. We're never going to have a secure border. We're not going to put a wall up for these hundreds and hundreds thousands of miles. We have to work with our neighbors. We need to think now for the future. Canada, the United States and Mexico as a block.

GLENN: Canada, Mexico and America as a block. That's who this guy is. Michelle?

MALKIN: A block, not a region. He said it many times. He also, when he worked for this Mexican bureaucracy called the presidential office for Mexican abroad, what he did was he spent his time traveling all across our country lobbying local, state and federal officials for driver's license for illegal aliens. He defended his operators who were carrying illegal aliens to the country and who promoted extending banking privileges here in the United States to illegal aliens, lobbied to get lower rates for them so that they could send home billions of dollars in remittances back to their country. The guy does not believe in borders. He is a senior fellow at something called the Reform Institute which is a think tank that John McCain founded and it has come under scrutiny by the mainstream media because it underscores John McCain's hypocrisy not just on open borders but also on campaign finance because he's used his supposedly nonpartisan, nonprofit thinking to solicit donations from big donors who he then goes and crusades for while he's sitting on Senate committees. At this reform institute which is in part funded with George Soros money, Juan Hernandez was in charge of leading the lobbying campaign for John McCain's amnesty effort last year. And this reform institute also sponsored an art contest for students where they spent their time demonizing the border. And you can go and look. I linked this on my website, to all of the art that compares the walls our borders and our border fences to the Berlin wall which keeps people in instead of walling people out to prevent invasion, to prevent undermining our sovereignty, to prevent encroaching of our laws. And for McCain to have the gall to stand there and tell that voter in Florida who, by the way, learned about this Juan Hernandez thing by looking at our research on the Internet, for him to say that he supports securing the border first when he's got a guy outreaching to illegal aliens to persuade them to make John McCain President? It's more than nauseating.

Thank you for this part Glenn Beck and Michelle Malkin .

So who in the Media will start asking John McCain about Juan Hernandez EVERYDAY????

Tuesday, March 30, 2010


A New Political Party Is Needed


Both Political Parties have failed the American people. They both have become so obsessed with power that they have lost complete sight of what their True duties are. They are more concerned about keeping their power then doing what is right for this country and the citizens of this country. With this mindset things that they do, bills that they pass, programs that they promote are mainly do with the thought of how it will help keep them in power.

There are numerous (3rd) third parties. The Republicans and Democrats have purposely made it hard for another party to have any influence if it is started. The difficulty of getting a candidate from a different party then the main two on a ballot is by design. That is wrong and it is something that should be changed.

It is truly time that a national 3rd party be started. The Republicans and Democrats have gotten so close about so many things that it doesn't make much difference who you vote for. Just hold your nose, close your eyes and vote. It is time to finally have a National Party that will represent the people and represent the foundation this country was built upon.

It will take many, many people to make this happen. People that have common sense and that TRULY love this country and the principals upon which it was founded. Many people with many ideas with a common goal of a true Patriot Party.

Who is ready to start this journey?

"Our hope will become the light that will shine the way to pave the road for our childen. The road of our children has to be a road of freedom." Don Nicely

If not for ourselves for our children.